How to Keep a Trading Journal (Template Included)
How to keep a trading journal in two minutes a trade: a free template, what to write, why results belong in R, and a ten-minute weekly review.
Almost every experienced trader tells you to keep a trading journal, and almost every new trader starts one and abandons it within a month. The journal asks for too much, gives back too little, and quietly becomes a list of losses nobody wants to read.
Quick answer: A trading journal is a short written record of every trade: what you traded, why you entered, the result in R (multiples of your risk), whether you followed your plan and how you felt beforehand. Two minutes per trade and a ten-minute weekly review are enough to show whether your method or your behaviour needs fixing.
What is a trading journal, and why keep one?
A trading journal is a record of the trades you take, written at the time, in the same format every time. Its job is to turn experience, which is vague and flattering, into evidence, which is neither.
The reason you need one is that memory is a generous editor. It keeps the trade where you caught the whole move and quietly drops the three impulsive trades around it. It remembers that you “nearly” had a good month. It files a loss taken after you moved your stop as bad luck, not a broken rule. Psychologists call one version of it confirmation bias: you notice the evidence that agrees with what you already believe.
A journal also does something more useful than keeping you honest. It separates two problems that feel identical from the inside. When you are losing money, it is hard to tell whether your method does not work or whether you are not following it. Those problems have opposite fixes. If the method is weak, you need to change your rules. If the method is fine and your execution is not, changing the rules is the worst thing you can do, because you throw away an edge you never actually tested. Only a written record can tell the two apart, and most beginners assume they have the first problem when they have the second.
This is why the journal sits at the centre of our Trading Psychology course. A trading plan tells you what you intend to do. The journal tells you what you actually did. The gap between the two is where most of your improvement will come from.
What to write in a trading journal: the six fields
Most journals die because they ask for too much. If an entry takes fifteen minutes, you will skip it after a losing day, which is exactly the day it matters most. A good forex trading journal has six fields and takes about two minutes. Here they are, laid out as a single entry.
1. Date, pair and direction
The basics, so you can later sort by pair, by day of the week or by session. After a few months you may find you do well in the London morning and badly in the quiet hours after New York closes, which is the kind of pattern our guide to forex market hours explains.
2. Why you entered, in one sentence
Name the setup, not the story. “Pullback to daily support in an uptrend, H1 hammer closed above it” is a reason. “It looked like it was going up” is not. If you cannot describe the reason in one sentence, there probably was no setup, and that is worth knowing. If your entries are based on levels, our guide to support and resistance in forex shows how to describe them precisely.
3. The result in R
Record the outcome as a multiple of what you risked, not in pounds or dollars. This is the field most beginners get wrong, so it has its own section below.
4. Did you follow your plan?
Yes or no. No partial credit, no “mostly”. If you entered without the setup, moved your stop loss further away, doubled the size, or closed a winner early out of nerves, the answer is no. This single field is what makes the journal valuable, because it lets you split your results into two groups later.
5. How you felt before the trade
One word: calm, confident, eager, anxious, frustrated, bored. Not how you felt after; how you felt when you clicked. Over time, this field shows which states come before your worst decisions. For most people, “frustrated” and “bored” are the dangerous ones.
6. One lesson (optional)
A short line, if there is something worth saying. “Waited for the candle to close; it paid off.” “Traded through the jobs report by accident.” If there is nothing to say, leave it blank.
What you should leave out is just as important. Screenshots of every chart, paragraphs of analysis, the news of the day and your entry price to five decimal places all feel diligent, and all make the habit harder to keep. You can add a screenshot for trades you want to study, but make it the exception. A journal you fill in every day beats a beautiful one you abandon.
Why you should record results in R, not money
R is short for risk. One R is the amount you planned to lose on a trade if it hit your stop. If you risk $50 and the trade hits its stop, the result is −1R. If it reaches a target twice as far away as the stop, the result is +2R. If you close it halfway, around +1R. The calculation is always the same:
Result in R = money made or lost ÷ money you planned to risk
Set the entry, stop and target below and you can see the reward measured in units of risk. A 30-pip stop and a 60-pip target is a 2:1 trade; if it works, the journal records +2R.
Break-even win rate = 1 ÷ (1 + R), where R is the reward-to-risk ratio. Costs push the real figure a little higher.
There are three good reasons to keep a journal in R multiples rather than money.
It makes trades comparable. A $50 loss means something very different on a $1,000 account than on a $10,000 one. As your account grows or shrinks, money figures drift, but R stays consistent. A −1R loss always means “the stop did its job”, whatever the balance.
It exposes broken rules. If you always risk a fixed percentage, every normal loss should be close to −1R. A −1.6R loss means something went wrong: you widened the stop, added to the position, or suffered slippage through a news release. Money figures hide this; R makes it jump off the page. A small difference, like −1.05R from spread and commission, is normal. Anything well beyond −1R deserves a note.
It turns your journal into a measure of edge. Add up the R values and divide by the number of trades and you have your expectancy: the average result per trade. A method that averages +0.2R over a hundred trades is working, whatever any single week looked like. A method that averages −0.2R is not, however exciting the best trade was.
To use R properly, you need a fixed risk per trade, set before you enter, and a stop on every trade. If those are new to you, the Academy lessons on risk per trade and reward-to-risk ratio cover them, and our guide on where to place a stop loss shows how to set the distance that defines 1R. If you think in pips rather than money, the arithmetic in what is a pip in forex converts one into the other.
Your trading journal template (try it here)
You do not need special software. A notebook, a spreadsheet or the template below all work, as long as you use the same six fields every time. The template saves entries in your browser and shows four running statistics as you add trades. You can download everything as a CSV file to open in any spreadsheet.
Trade journal
Saved in this browser only. Over fifty trades, the last column shows what breaking the plan costs you.
Try it with a few made-up trades first. Add three or four with “Followed the plan?” set to Yes and results of +2 or −1, then add two set to No with results such as −1.5. Watch the last statistic, the average result when the plan was broken. On a real account, after fifty or so trades, that number is the most honest feedback you will ever get.
If you prefer a spreadsheet, set up one row per trade and one column per field. Here is what a realistic week looks like for a trader risking 1% of a $5,000 account, so 1R is $50.
| Day | Pair | Dir | Why I entered | Result | Plan? | Feeling | Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon | EUR/USD | Buy | Pullback to daily support in uptrend, H1 hammer | +2.0R | Yes | Calm | Waited for the close |
| Tue | GBP/USD | Sell | Rejection at weekly resistance | −1.0R | Yes | Calm | Valid setup, normal loss |
| Tue | GBP/USD | Sell | Wanted the morning loss back | −1.5R | No | Frustrated | No setup; widened the stop |
| Wed | USD/JPY | Buy | Breakout above range high, retest held | −1.0R | Yes | Calm | Retest failed on the US open |
| Thu | EUR/USD | Buy | Pullback to H4 support, trend up | +2.0R | Yes | Confident | Same setup as Monday |
| Fri | AUD/USD | Sell | Price was falling fast | −1.0R | No | Eager | Chased the move, no level |
The four plan-followed trades made +2.0R in total, an average of +0.5R. The two plan-broken trades lost −2.5R, an average of −1.25R. The week finished at −0.5R, or −$25. The method made money; the two impulsive trades took it all back and more. One of them was a classic case of revenge trading, and the other was a fear-of-missing-out chase. Both are covered in the Academy lesson on FOMO and revenge trading.
A few practical rules make any format work. Write the entry the same day, ideally within an hour of closing, while the honest version is still available. Log every trade, including the ones you are embarrassed about. Keep demo and live trades in separate journals, because they are different experiments. And if you trade on a demo account first, start journalling there: it is the cheapest place to build the habit.
How to review your trading journal each week
Recording trades is only half the job. The value comes from reading them back. A trade review does not need to be long; ten minutes once a week, at the same time, is enough. A weekend works well, while the market is closed.
Read every entry from the week, then answer three questions in writing.
Which setups are earning? Group trades by the reason you wrote in field two. If pullbacks to support are averaging +0.4R and breakouts are averaging −0.3R over twenty trades or more, that is a finding. Over five trades, it is noise.
Which feeling preceded the broken-plan trades? Filter for “Plan: No” and read the feeling column. If most say “frustrated”, your problem shows up after losses. If most say “bored”, it shows up in quiet markets. Each points to a different rule.
What is the one rule to add or tighten? Only one. “No new trade within 30 minutes of a loss.” “No trades in the hour after the New York close.” “Maximum two trades a day.” If you change five things at once, next week’s results cannot tell you which change helped.
Then close the journal and do something else. The review is not a second chance to trade the week again in your head. Tick the steps off below if it helps; the list saves in your browser so you can reuse it each week.
Weekly trading journal review
0 of 7
The rule you choose belongs in your written trading plan, not just in your head. If you do not have one yet, the Academy lesson on building a trading plan gives you a one-page template that pairs naturally with this journal.
Trade review: what your journal tells you after 50 trades
A single week of journal entries tells you very little about your method. It tells you plenty about your behaviour, because broken rules are visible immediately, but whether your setup has an edge needs a bigger sample. As a rough working rule, wait for at least fifty trades before judging a method, and more is better. Below that, luck dominates.
Once you have fifty entries, one comparison becomes possible: the average result when you followed the plan versus when you did not.
In the chart, the thirty-eight trades taken by the rules made +11.4R between them. The twelve taken outside the rules lost −10.8R. Net, the trader is roughly flat after fifty trades and might easily conclude the method does not work. The journal says otherwise: the method made money, and a quarter of the trades gave it back.
Reading the comparison gives you a clear diagnosis:
- Plan-followed trades positive, plan-broken trades negative. Your method has an edge; your discipline is the problem. Do not change the strategy. Work on the conditions that lead to broken rules: the feelings, the times of day, the trades after a loss.
- Plan-followed trades negative over a decent sample. The method itself needs work. Change one rule at a time and keep journalling, so you can see whether each change helps.
- Too few plan-followed trades to judge. You are not yet testing your method at all. The first job is to follow it consistently, then measure.
Even a method with a real edge produces long losing runs. The simulator below plays out a hundred trades at 1% risk with a 40% win rate and 2:1 reward-to-risk, which works out to an expectancy of +0.2R per trade. Run it a few times and look at the worst stretches.
Each run uses the same settings with different luck. Run it several times: the shape changes, the drawdowns don't go away.
Strings of six, eight or even more losses appear regularly in those runs, despite a positive average. Without a journal, a run like that feels like proof the method has stopped working, and that feeling is what pushes traders to abandon good rules at the worst moment. With a journal, you can check: were the losing trades taken by the plan, at normal size, with losses near −1R? If so, it is a losing streak, not a broken method. The Academy lessons on losing streaks and drawdowns go into how to handle them.
Reading your equity curve alongside your notes
Your equity curve is a chart of your account, or your cumulative R, after each trade. On its own it shows what happened. Next to your journal it shows why. Every sharp drop and every recovery has entries behind it.
In the example above, the curve falls from +3R to −2.5R. Without notes, you would assume the method had a bad patch. The journal tells a more specific story. The first three losses were normal: valid setups, plan followed, about −1R each, the kind any method produces. The damage came from the next two trades, both marked “Plan: No” and both preceded by “Frustrated”. One had a widened stop and lost −1.5R. At the weekly review the trader added one rule, stop trading for the day after two losses, and the recovery that followed was made entirely of plan-followed trades.
That is the pattern to look for. Drops made of −1R losses with “Plan: Yes” beside them are the cost of doing business. Drops made of oversized losses with “Plan: No” and an emotional word beside them are the cost of tilt, and they are avoidable. When you understand that difference in your own record, the psychology lessons in our guide to trading psychology stop being abstract.
A note on honesty: the curve only means something if the journal is complete. Regulators publish sobering figures here. When the European Securities and Markets Authority restricted leverage on retail CFDs in 2018, it reported that between 74% and 89% of retail accounts lost money on these products (ESMA). A complete journal is one of the few tools that tells you, early and cheaply, which side of that figure you are on. Our guide to leverage in forex explains why oversized positions are so often the cause.
Common trading journal mistakes
Recording only the losing trades
Winners carry just as much information. A win taken against the plan teaches you that breaking the rules works. If it is not in the journal marked “Plan: No”, you will repeat it. Every trade goes in.
Making each entry too long
Long entries feel thorough and kill the habit within weeks. If an entry takes more than two or three minutes, cut fields until it does not. You can always write more about a trade you want to study.
Writing in money instead of R
Money figures make a $40 loss on Monday and an $80 loss on Friday look like different things when they may both be −1R. They also hide the trades where you broke your risk rule. Convert everything to R.
Changing the method after a few bad weeks
A dozen trades is not a test. Judging a method on a small sample, especially during a drawdown, leads to endless strategy-hopping and no real evidence about anything. Wait for at least fifty plan-followed trades before deciding.
Never reading it back
A journal you fill in but never review is just a list. The review is where the value is created. Put ten minutes in your diary each week and treat it as part of trading, not an optional extra. It is also a useful record if you ever need to work out gains and losses for tax; rules vary by country, so check your own tax authority’s guidance, such as HMRC in the UK.
Frequently asked questions
What should I write in a trading journal?
Keep each entry to six fields: date, pair and direction; why you entered, in one sentence; the result in R; whether you followed your plan; how you felt before the trade; and one optional lesson. That takes about two minutes and gives you everything a weekly review needs.
Is there a free trading journal template?
Yes. The interactive template on this page saves entries in your browser and can download them as a CSV file for any spreadsheet. You can also copy the six columns into a spreadsheet or a paper notebook. The format matters far less than filling it in for every trade.
What does R mean in a trading journal?
R stands for risk: the amount you planned to lose if the trade hit its stop. A trade that hits its stop is −1R; one that reaches a target twice as far away is +2R. Recording results in R keeps trades comparable as your account size changes.
How often should I review my trading journal?
Once a week for about ten minutes, at the same time each week. Read every entry, compare plan-followed and plan-broken results, look at the feelings before broken trades, and choose one rule to add or tighten. Judge the method itself only after fifty or more trades.
Should I use a spreadsheet or a notebook for a forex trading journal?
Either works. A spreadsheet makes it easy to filter by pair or setup and to calculate averages in R. A notebook can feel more personal and is quicker for some people. Choose the one you will actually fill in after a losing day.
Is a trading journal worth it for beginners?
Yes, especially for beginners. Early on, most losses come from broken rules rather than a bad method, and only a written record can show the difference. Starting the habit on a demo account costs nothing and makes it automatic before real money is involved.
Free course
Learn this step by step
“Trading Psychology” is a free BrokerCut Academy course: 7 short lessons (about 56 minutes), quizzes, interactive tools and a certificate when you finish.
Enrol free
